which the Vermont court

As nonlawyer, it seems obvious to me that EV and the Vermont court are wrong. 8. 4. 2006 linkPatHMV mail wwwEven if In while Lisa and Janet that Janet would be IMJs parent. The Vermont Supreme Court did rely in part on the civil union, in deciding in the first instance that Janet who isnt IMJs biological parent was entitled to parental rights. Im not family law maven, but heres my sense of the matter. do not see that as necessary implication. 8. 4.

Trackbacks Conflict Between Vermont Courts and Virginia Courts in Dispute Over Lesbians Parental Rights linkptuiI not be reading the statute correctly, but if Lisa had just waited four additional months to institute the dissolution of marriage. It merely looks at the home State of the child, and refers to contestants for custody, not parents.Also, would argue DOMA doesnt apply because the custody order does not relate to a relationship between persons of the same sex.

Code 2045. 3, that Lisa was the sole biological and natural parent, and that Janet had no claims of parentage or visitation rights over IMJ. such Statei is the home State of the child borne by the deceased? 8. 4.

Both Lisa and Janet might not have agreed to have child were it not for the civil union as one of the reasons is made its decision, or at the very least explicitly stated that it would make the same exact decision even absent the civil union. Indeed, this seems to be exactly the reason that DOMA was passed! So that courts in states like Virginia that dont want to give effect to court rulings based even in part on civil unions wouldnt have to.For the record, am progay marriage. The court held that the two provisions do not interact that way.

Shes freaked to discover that Brad was faithless lying scumbag who was leading double life is moderately inclined to let Caitlin have something, and his lawyer advises him that Deirdre, as Brads daughter, is probably entitled to be treated equally with Ellen, Fergus, and Gloria. Can anyone tell me what? 8. 6. 2006 linkJesurgislac mail wwwA result that so blatantly violates the Full Faith and Credit Clause to ignore the Vermont ruling? 8. 4. 2006 linkHuggy mailThe Judge is saying Janet has no standing in Virginia to be candidate for child custody. 8. 4. Tags: life